DEALERS CHOICE AUTO TRANSPORT INC
DEALERS CHOICE AUTO TRANSPORT INC has a TrustScore of 64/100, which places it in the Mixed range. Customers most often point to strong communication, highly reliable pickup timing, and a good delivery record, which are meaningful positives. The score does not reach Trusted because pricing feedback includes frequent increases and there is a recurring vehicle-damage concern that needs attention. Issue resolution also looks less consistent than the company’s better-rated service areas, so the evidence supports cautious consideration rather than a clear endorsement.
Reviews across platforms
What They're Good At & What to Watch
Where DEALERS CHOICE AUTO TRANSPORT INC delivers
Customers frequently report clear
Customers frequently report clear communication and helpful updates.
Pickup timing is a standout strength
Pickup timing is a standout strength, with many reports of on-time collection.
Delivery performance is also
Delivery performance is also rated well by customers.
Driver professionalism is viewed
Driver professionalism is viewed positively in many mentions.
What to be aware of
Some customers report price
Some customers report price increases after the initial quote.
There is a recurring
There is a recurring pattern of vehicle-damage complaints.
Issue resolution appears less
Issue resolution appears less consistent than the company’s best-rated service areas.
Company information
Held by the carrier, not DEALERS CHOICE AUTO TRANSPORT INC. If your vehicle is damaged, the claim goes against the carrier’s policy. Always photograph the vehicle before handoff and document any damage on the Bill of Lading at delivery before signing.
About DEALERS CHOICE AUTO TRANSPORT INC
DEALERS CHOICE AUTO TRANSPORT INC has a TrustScore of 64/100, which places it in the Mixed range. Customers most often point to strong communication, highly reliable pickup timing, and a good delivery record, which are meaningful positives. The score does not reach Trusted because pricing feedback includes frequent increases and there is a recurring vehicle-damage concern that needs attention. Issue resolution also looks less consistent than the company’s better-rated service areas, so the evidence supports cautious consideration rather than a clear endorsement.